-
For Granite Staters: the New Hampshire Liberty Alliance
has issued
their (PDF)
"2009 Liberty Rating" for our state legislators.
My reps in Strafford District 2 earned (in descending order) a D-plus, a D, two D-minuses, and an F. D-minus was the most common score, earned by 91 of the state legislators.
My senator, Amanda Merrill, wangled a D-minus as well.
Amazingly, this was an improvement over last year's dismal performance. But not enough of an improvement to make me vote for any of them, ever.
-
President Obama wrote (well, put his name on) an op-ed
column in Saturday's Washington Post. Interesting
rebuttals:
-
Keith
Hennessey decries the President's historical revisionism. Keith was
Dubya's senior economic advisor, so he's compelled to defend that
record, but feel free to discount that. One of his points is especially
on target, where he considers the President's (convenient) plea for
patience, because his stimulus "was, from the start, a two-year program":
This did not have to be a two-year program. Congress could have front-loaded the stimulus had they instead given the cash directly to the American people, as they did on a bipartisan basis in early 2008. We would have saved much of it, paying off our mortgages, student loans, and credit cards (which would not be a bad thing). We would have spent the rest much more quickly than the federal and state government bureaucracies now stumbling through their usual corrupt, slow and inefficient processes. Instead the President handed the money and program design over to a Congress of his own party, who saw it as a big honey pot rather than as an exercise in macroeconomic fiscal policy. The President’s primary macroeconomic policy mistake was allowing Congress to pervert a rapid Keynesian stimulus into a slow-spending interest-based binge.
Indeed. Let's not forget John Kerry's honesty back in February when he explained why he opposed stimulative tax cuts: "If you put a tax cut into the hands of a business or family, there's no guarantee that they're going to invest that or invest it in America. They're free to go invest anywhere that they want if they choose to invest." Much better to leave those "investment" choices safely in the hands of Democratic politicians. -
Bill Kristol has a shorter but even more damning
indictment
of Obama's op-ed:
[…] here are some words you won’t find: profits, investment, incentives, taxes, risk, enterprise or markets. Or freedom, or liberty.
Also missing: capital/capitalism, private, regulation.We're in bad shape when the President can't even pay his usual lip service to free markets and capitalism.
-
At Pajamas Media, Jennifer Rubin concentrates
on the bipartisan reaction to the Administration's claim
to be taken unaware by the seriousness of the economic
meltdown. Everyone agrees: it doesn't pass the giggle
test with anyone with a memory longer than a few months.
-
Keith
Hennessey decries the President's historical revisionism. Keith was
Dubya's senior economic advisor, so he's compelled to defend that
record, but feel free to discount that. One of his points is especially
on target, where he considers the President's (convenient) plea for
patience, because his stimulus "was, from the start, a two-year program":
-
Richard Feynman was a theoretical physicist whose Nobel-prizewinning
research could make one's head spin. (And he'd be happy to point out
that your head was conserving angular momentum while spinning.)
But he was unparalleled at exploring and explaining more mundane topics too. Check out the video where he describes how trains stay on the track. Without even a chalkboard, a 147-second masterpiece of teaching. (Via GeekPress.)
Jul
13
2009
URLs du Jour
2009-07-13