URLs du Jour

2018-12-29

[Amazon Link]
(paid link)

  • At the Josiah Bartlett Center for Public Policy, Drew Cline warns New Hampshire residents: Brace for business tax increases in 2019.

    The incoming chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee wants New Hampshire to go from having the second-lowest corporate tax rate in New England to the second-highest (based on Tax Foundation rankings). The incoming House speaker initially expressed opposition to the idea, only to backtrack in an interview with the New Hampshire Union Leader.

    The message is clear: Expect the House to pass a large business tax increase in 2019.

    Yeesh.


  • After 700+ days of the Trump Presidency, Mona Charen finally notices (at NR) that the Commander in Chief has a small problem with running his fact-free mouth off: Trump’s Fake News about Military Pay -- Trump Is Undermined By His Own Lies.

    Remarkable, isn’t it, that Donald Trump has made decrying “fake news” his calling card? Is the press hostile to him? Sure. Do they lie about him? For the most part, no. Then again, the truth is not everyone’s friend. As William Randolph Hearst once quipped: “If Mr. Hughes will stop telling lies about me, I’ll stop telling the truth about him.” Or, even better, William F. Buckley said of Gore Vidal: “Anyone who lies about him is doing him a favor.”

    On his visit to Iraq, the president lied to the troops. How can you claim to honor people you are lying to? Lying signals contempt. “We are always going to protect you. And you just saw that, ’cause you just got one of the biggest pay raises you’ve ever received. . . . You haven’t gotten one in more than ten years. More than ten years. And we got you a big one. I got you a big one.”

    Sure. Here’s the Pentagon’s online account of pay raises over the past ten years. The military received raises each year for the past ten years.

    I don't know if he's technically "lying"; that would require intention to deceive, right? Not that "making stuff up on the fly" is much better.


  • Reason's Peter Suderman notes that It Sure Looks Like This Obamacare Program Has Led to More People Dying. Specifically, a mandated Medicare penalty for hospitals with "too many readmissions for pneumonia, heart failure, and heart attack."

    It was hoped to be a taxpayer-friendly incentive for hospitals. But

    A new study appears to dash that hope, at least as far as readmissions are concerned.

    The study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and conducted by by researchers associated with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical and Harvard Medical School, looked at hospitalizations between 2005 and 2015. It found that "30-day post-discharge mortality"—the number of people who died within a month of leaving the hospital—increased for heart failure patients after the readmissions penalty program was implemented.

    Although heart failure mortality was already on the rise, the rate of increase became more rapid after Medicare started penalizing readmissions. In addition, mortality rates amongst pneumonia patients, which had been stable, increased.

    Fewer people were being readmitted to hospitals, but more people were dying.

    Hey, maybe that was the plan all along.


  • Geez, with legislatures reluctant to pass draconian "gun control" laws, how else will good Progressives harass citizens looking to buy weaponry? At Cato, Walter Olson looks at a recent scheme: NYT Report Pushes Credit Card Companies To Monitor Gun Buyers.

    To some of its advocates, the cause of gun control is precious enough to be worth jettisoning not just the rights protected by the Second Amendment but many other individual liberties, including – as recent New York controversies suggest – First Amendment rights of speech and association and Fourth Amendment rights against search and seizure. Now, if a New York Times article is any indication, comes the turn of financial privacy.

    In an advocacy piece imperfectly dressed up as a news story, New York Times financial reporter Andrew Ross Sorkin observes that some perpetrators of mass public shootings have bought guns and ammo using credit cards, and asks why credit card companies and banks should not be made to stop this. How? Well, they could “create systems to track gun purchases that would allow them to report suspicious patterns” and “prevent [customers] from buying multiple guns in a short period of time.” Invoking the Patriot Act – you knew that was coming, didn’t you? – the piece goes on to ask why the sweeping financial-snooping powers bestowed on the feds by that act should not be deployed against everyday civilians who purchase more guns than would seem fit for them to buy.

    The ACLU has been wobbly on civil liberties of late, but the Sorkin article quotes one of their policy analysts mildly objecting: "The implication of expecting the government to detect and prevent every mass shooting is believing the government should play an enormously intrusive role in American life.”


Last Modified 2024-01-24 11:52 AM EDT