Note: I've been choosing to concentrate on Presidential politics over the past months. That can seem inappropriate when the latest murderous horror sweeps over the country. Still, I don't have much to say that hasn't already been said better by others.
So I'll continue with the normal shtick until further notice.
PredictWise has (again) judged that Bernie has approximately zero chance of becoming our next President, almost certainly due to the FBI's determination that some people are just too important to prosecute. So we are back to the big three, and Trump has pulled out to a solid phony lead against Hillary:
|Query String||Hit Count||Change Since
|"Donald Trump" phony||585,000||+69,000|
|"Hillary Clinton" phony||518,000||-52,000|
|"Gary Johnson" phony||24,900||+700|
A major component of wisdom is the ability to make distinctions,
and so i recommend this NR article:
and Bull**** Artists" by Fred Schwarz.
People say Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are both liars, and that’s correct in the sense that they both make a general principle of avoiding the truth. To be precise, though, Hillary is a liar, while Trump is something a bit different: a bull**** artist. (I’ll use the abbreviation BSA to save on asterisks; we’ll need them later on.) One of the many ways you can tell: When Hillary is caught in a lie, she doubles down on it, but when Trump is caught in a lie, he casually switches to a different one.
Verdict: on target.
The Trump campaign tweeted something controversial.
The six-pointed star caused some to accuse Trump of anti-Semitism. That, by itself, doesn't make a lot of sense; sometimes a star is just a star. But it was taken from a genuinely vile website. I found a guest article by a Power Line commenter to be persuasive:
Is Donald Trump himself a misogynist, racist, Jew-hating troglodyte? Heavens no. I would surmise, in complete seriousness, that there is not enough substance to that shallow, self-absorbed cartoon of a man even to BE a misogynist, racist, or an anti-Semite. Perversely, for Trump to be a misogynist, a racist or an anti-Semite would actually require him a measure of introspection (albeit, in a warped form) that he rather obviously lacks. Rather, the world begins and ends with Donald Trump. Nothing, and no one else, even exists.
That should not detract from the fact that Hillary Clinton is, indeed, the "most corrupt candidate ever." Well, maybe not ever. Within living memory, Lyndon Baines Johnson is a real contender. But in the past half-century? Sure. Put that in a star, oval, hexagon, whatever.
One of the more tedious tropes of the 21st-century American Progressive
is to dismiss any dissent from orthodoxy as "hate". While discussing
Hillary's documented dishonesty and gross negligence in handling
classified material, John Kass makes
I'm certain that many will clench their fists and denounce me as a Clinton-Hater. But hate by definition is irrational, and so I reject the hater diagnosis.
Instead, I'm probably something of a Clinton-Loather. Hate is about the loss of control, like the barking of a dog or someone who shrieks into the wind or at a crowd. Loathing takes time and consideration. And I've had years of watching the Clintons lie and dissemble and tell partial truths and get away with it, and take advantage of the principles of honorable men such as James Comey.
Loathe. Good word.
Heat Street is an irreverent clickbait site owned by the
otherwise staid Dow Jones. I think it's aimed at folks who
(like me) got
turned off from the abomination that Breitbart has become.
Example headline: "Imbiber-In-Chief: Hillary Clinton Plans to Drink Heavily as President"
My immediate reaction: not as heavily as I will.