Woo, that's a lot of snow out there. Obviously, I should
started clearing the driveway blog.
■ Does Proverbs
17:25 say anything about procrastination? No, it's another gripe
about kids' shortcomings:
25 A foolish son brings grief to his father
and bitterness to the mother who bore him.
Note: this is pretty much the same Proverb as
The Proverbialist is no fan of fools, especially ones in his family.
He takes no responsibility for their foolishness though.
■ We try to keep things PG-13 at Pun Salad, but sensitive souls
should skip to the next item: Judge overturns campus rape finding after officials call accused student ‘motherf—er’
Just before Christmas, a judge overturned the University of Southern
California’s 2016 sexual-assault finding against an accused student,
deeming him the victim of a process that was not “fair, thorough,
reliabl[y] neutral and impartial.”
One of the errors made by the private institution? The Title IX coordinator and investigator repeatedly called the male student and his adviser “motherfuckers” after they forgot to hang up on a call with them.
In theory, it's possible for University student conduct
investigators to be professional and unbiased. In practice, way too
many of them are ideology-driven authoritarian thugs.
The only bright spot: a lot of them are also totally incompetent at
making even the pretense of fairness,
even at a school like USC.
■ @kevinNR has some legal
advice for POTUS: If
Trump Has Been Defamed, He Should Sue.
Michael Wolff has published a sensational new book about the
Trump administration. In it, he quotes Steve Bannon, formerly
the chief executive of the Trump campaign and chairman of Trump
propaganda outlet Breitbart, characterizing
meetings between Donald Trump Jr. and Russian operatives as
“unpatriotic” and “treasonous.” Bannon also is quoted as saying
that there is “zero” chance that Donald Trump himself was
unaware of the meetings.
There are many amusing anecdotes in the book that tend to
confirm the worst suspicions of the administration’s critics.
Wolff writes of Kellyanne Conway’s maneuvering on Election Day,
expecting a resounding loss but hoping to parlay her work into a
lucrative Fox News contract. There are cabinet secretaries such
as Rex Tillerson and quondam allies such as Rupert Murdoch who
dismiss the president as an imbecile surrounded by dilettantes,
opportunists, and con artists. Trump’s children maneuver
fecklessly, and he himself retreats into a cocoon of fast food
and cable news. It is the sort of thing that those who take an
uncharitable view of the president — and no one takes a more
uncharitable view than I do — would have expected.
From what I gather, Wolff has a long history of making stuff up.
Trump should have, at most, simply pointed this out, and otherwise
ignored him, but that's not in Trump's nature.
■ David Harsanyi has a bone to pick with journalists who breezily
invoke tame anti-market economists in articles and columns:
Say’ A Lot Of Things. But They’re Mostly Wrong.
“A wave of optimism has swept over American business leaders, and it
is beginning to translate into the sort of investment in new plants,
equipment and factory upgrades that bolsters economic growth, spurs
job creation — and may finally raise wages significantly,” opens
a recent New York Times article surveying the state of
the American economy.
One imagines readers of the esteemed paper were surprised to run
across such a rosy assessment after being bombarded with news of a
homicidal Republican tax plan for so many weeks. Not to worry! Over
the next few thousand words, the authors do their best to assure
readers that neither deregulation nor tax cuts are really behind
this new economic activity — even if business leaders keep telling
For example, “There is little historical evidence tying regulation levels to growth,” the Times claims. A few paragraphs later we again learn that, “The evidence is weak that regulation actually reduces economic activity or that deregulation stimulates it.”
Pro tip: you have a good (but not infallible) chance of getting
straight economy-related news from the Wall Street Journal.
■ Oregon enacted legislation that would allow (but not
mandate) some rural gas stations to have self-service
Alex Tabarrok notes the ridicule being spent on Oregonians freaking
out at the concept of customer-operated gas pumps. But wait, there's
a more general point being ignored:
Action Kills Innovation.
Most of the rest of the America–where people pump their own gas everyday without a second thought–is having a good laugh at Oregon’s expense. But I am not here to laugh because in every state but one where you can pump your own gas you can’t open a barbershop without a license. A license to cut hair! Ridiculous. I hope people in Alabama are laughing at the rest of America. Or how about a license to be a manicurist? Go ahead Connecticut, laugh at the other states while you get your nails done. Buy contact lens without a prescription? You have the right to smirk British Columbia!
… and Granite Staters should not chuckle at Oregon while under the soapy hands
■ On the other hand, it's healthy to laugh. The Babylon
Bee reports: Oregon
Man Attempts To Decipher Gasoline Pump As Though It Were Advanced
After a new law took effect January 1st overturning a ban on
self-service gas stations, local Oregonian Brax Olson got out of his
vehicle and stared mesmerized at a gasoline pump, attempting to
figure out how it worked as though it were some monolithic piece of
alien tech left over from an advanced race of visitors from the
The man stared transfixed at the handle and surmised it was some
kind of holding device used by ancient visitors to earth, who may
have grasped the bizarre apparatus and somehow fueled their
spaceships. Drawing on the wealth of knowledge he had attained
gaining his Master’s degree in English literature, the 48-year-old
barista figured out how to remove the hose from the eldritch machine
and place it in his vehicle, the nozzle miraculously fitting in his
Subaru, though it was clearly designed for some kind of interstellar
Funny. But if you're in New Hampshire, we have our
own problems with government restrictions on market
transactions. We trust people to be able to pump their own gas, but
houses people might want to buy, in places where they might want