Tim Worstall's article at
Tech Central Station today is much worth reading.
He claims recent studies show (a) the sensitivity of global temperature
to CO2 levels is less than thought and (b) economic models
estimating future CO2 emissions have a systematic error that
cause them to swing high. But unfortunately (c) the UN panel charged
with investigating this isn't interested in straightening out this
We are (depending upon which side of the argument you are on) either
facing the greatest threat to the health of the planet or we're about to
spend trillions upon trillions of dollars on fixing something that
doesn't actually need fixing.
Worstall advocates figuring out which, as would most reasonable people.
Cathy Seipp describes
why she's a skeptic on gay marriage. For example:
What agitators for gay marriage never address is why a homosexual
domestic partnership should be more worthy of government approval (or
employee benefits) than a myriad of other domestic partnerships. Why not
two single moms who live together with their children, like Kate
& Allie? Or a straight woman and her gay male best friend, like
Will & Grace? Or two unmarried heterosexual sisters who live
together and share all expenses — kind of an old-fashioned
arrangement, but certainly not extinct; I happen to be friends with a
pair like this myself. Why can't they get a tax break?
Maybe Andrew Sullivan should take this up. It'd be more interesting
than the over-and-over Bush-bashing.
And via the Bleat,
your new philosophy: goat on the pole.
Some misguided people think the goat is not on the pole; they're wrong,
those theories are passé.
Unquoted opinions expressed herein are solely those of the
Pun Salad is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates
Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a
means for the blogger to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.