The Josiah Bartlett Center
for Public Policy is a local think tank focusing on local
issues. It believes in "individual freedom and responsibility,
limited and accountable government, and an appreciation of the role
of the free enterprise system."
One minor irritant
was its weekly mail, currently being written by Drew
Cline. It was routinely informative and insightful and there was
no good way to share it.
Well, good news: they've started putting it on the web, too. (Welcome to 2001, guys!) There's too much to keep up with, but here's a sample, on current efforts to raise NH's minimum wage to $15/hr: The minimum wage is virtue signaling.Laws are expressions of moral values. Markets are expressions of economic values (mostly). Even when markets are pushing pay rates higher, people who view the world a certain way find this unacceptable precisely because it does not come from a moral directive.
For the conspicuously virtuous, everything all the time has to be an expression of moral values. Markets don’t operate that way. They consider tradeoffs, which the conspicuously virtuous rarely do. Everything is black and white, good or bad.
So even if markets are driving wages higher, society must act collectively to mandate that wages never fall below whatever the virtuous wage floor of the moment is. Refusal to pass such a mandate is considered a society-wide moral failure.
Or to put it in the contemporary vernacular, minimum wages are virtue signaling.
And advocates don't particularly care about the people who would lose their jobs (or never be hired in the first place) with an increased minimum wage.
Jonah Goldberg's G-File this week is relatively short but also
(as usual) insightful:
Zero-Sum Thinking Behind Group Rights. Taking off on this tweet
from a semi-famous "comedian":
I’m hearing a lot of “so men are just supposed to be scared of women now?” I mean, if that’s what needs to happen for you to be cool to us, maybe. We’ve been scared of you for like six thousand years. You’ll get used to it after a while.— Whitney Cummings (@WhitneyCummings) September 20, 2018
I think it's obvious that Whitney Cummings hasn't been scared for six thousand years. Take it, Jonah:I find the concept of historic grievances fascinating. There is something very “sticky,” in an evolutionary sense, to the idea of getting payback for the crimes committed against your ancestors. If you find this to be an astonishingly novel insight, here’s a list of history books you should read: all of them.
The human — never mind the Hebrew — in me can relate to some of this (Damn Jebusites, you haven’t suffered nearly enough!). But a Jew born in, say, 1980 shouldn’t have any hate in his heart for a German born the same year, never mind an Egyptian. A German born four decades after the Holocaust isn’t responsible for the Holocaust any more than an Egyptian today is responsible for Hebrew bondage millennia ago.
Bottom line: Group rights are dangerous garbage, justifying atrocious and unjust behavior. And for a specific example…
Andrew Klavan at the Daily Wire:
Process Trumps #MeToo.
So much is disturbing about the Brett Kavanaugh fracas. The cynical political use of a wholly unverifiable charge to tarnish the reputation of an admired and accomplished man is disgusting. The idea that the party that rallied around “Lion of the Senate” Ted Kennedy and alleged rapist Bill Clinton now has the authority to lecture us on how to treat women is galling in its hypocrisy. And, as always, the one-sided and unfair reporting by the mainstream media is not just infuriating but also crippling to our national conversation.
But for all that, what strikes me as most dangerous about this Democrat-made fiasco is the phenomenon of leftist feminist women using their suddenly sacred feminine sensitivities to try to bully us out of our commitment to due process.
Ramirez expresses it pictorially:
More, and almost certainly worse, tomorrow.