URLs du Jour

2018-12-20

[Amazon Link]
(paid link)

  • I find myself in basic agreement with John Glaser at Cato: Trump Is Right to Withdraw From Syria.

    President Trump has ordered a withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria. This is the right decision. The U.S. military presence in Syria has not been authorized by Congress, is illegal under international law, lacks a coherent strategy, and carries significant risks of entangling America in a broader quagmire in yet another Middle Eastern country.

    "Other than that, though, it's fine." But in the interests of equal time, check out editors of National Review; they believe we should Stay in Syria. Their bottom line:

    One would think that a GOP administration would have learned the lessons of Obama’s reckless withdrawal from Iraq. American retreats often create power vacuums that are often filled by American enemies. Now, after all the blood spilled and tears shed since the rise of ISIS, Donald Trump is set to make his own version of Obama’s deadly mistake.

    Er, OK, fine. Cato and I could be wrong. NR makes a good point about the Kurds, who have a good reason to be upset at the US's on-again, off-again support.

    And at Reason, Elizabeth Nolan Brown (in her daily aggregation of news stories) concentrates on how various factions are clutching their pearls in dread that American soldiers might finally be moving out of harm's way: Trump Doubles Down on Withdrawing Troops From Syria Despite Freakout From Warmongering Establishment.

    Following President Donald Trump's Wednesday announcement that all U.S. troops would be pulled from Syria, political establishment types on the left and right promptly rebuked him for being insufficiently committed to Forever War in the Middle East.

    Policing the world's politics and bombing brown people is one of the few things that mainstream Republicans and Democrats can come together on, and now here's Trump, the big meanie, spoiling their fun! Quick, cue rampant paranoia and a lot of Henny-Penny huffing...

    Today's Amazon Product du Jour: one of the things that comes up when you search for "power vacuum".


  • At NR, Kevin D. Williamson says (in an "NRPLUS" article) that we should be Learning the Real Lesson of Obamacare. Especially Paul Krugman, who didn't like the recent court ruling undoing Obamacare, since its individual mandate is no longer a credible "tax" or a mandate, either.

    'Sabotage,” Paul Krugman calls it. Funny word, that.

    Perhaps Professor Krugman, like so many progressives at the moment, has Russia on the brain.

    In the penal code of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, that crime — вредительство, “causing damage” — was sometimes referred to as “wrecking,” “diversion,” or “counter-revolutionary sabotage.” The secret police were always on the hunt for the “Trotskyite wreckers” who were, apparently, hiding under every bushel of rotted beets. They were sent to the gulag or shot in the head. Some of the early Bolsheviks had wanted to abolish capital punishment, considering it emblematic of czarist high-handedness. “Nonsense,” said V. I. Lenin. “How can you make a revolution without executions?”

    Cyrillic in originnal! I'm not saying Paul Krugman is a Leninist/Stalinist, but I'm not saying he's not, either.


  • At AEI, Jonah Goldberg points out some political reality: Trump’s hard-core supporters aren’t enough. Looking at the pundits' scoring of the big Oval Office bout between Trump, Pelosi, and Schumer about border wall funding:

    Even Yahoo News’ Matt Bai, a decidedly left-leaning observer, excoriated liberals for not understanding that “Trump knows that every time he flouts the staid convention of the office, every time he does the thing that seems inappropriate among the political set, he’s winning with the chunk of the electorate he still has.”

    Sure. The problem is that chunk is not a majority.

    Bai’s larger observation — that Trump is so embattled he can’t afford to lose his hard-core supporters — is a good one in the context of gaming out how Trump can survive impeachment. When looking at what advances this administration’s agenda or is good for the Republican party, however, “his base loves it” doesn’t score any points.

    I don't see how Trump stands a chance in 2020. But to be fair, I thought he was toast in 2016.


  • At the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, James Lileks pleads: Please let the Boomer's Music Die.

    Example: There is a time and a place for Steppenwolf’s “Born to Be Wild” and that time happened a half-century ago, and the place was some dorm room where people were rapping about Nixon, man.

    The time and place is not the airport bar at 7:30 a.m.

    But there it was, blaring out over the speakers while bleary-eyed people spooned steam-table eggs into their faces. Airports exist in a strange limbo where time is irrelevant until it is specifically crucial. It’s never morning or night, it’s just a timeless void you endure until it’s time to board and depart. So of course the bar is open. Someone who’s been up for 17 hours may need a drink. Of course the music is loud and lousy — it’s a bar.

    James makes a good case for bringing back Muzak. As a boomer who loves his music, I find it hard to disagree.


  • Via Power Line, a Bret Stephens NYT column aimed at "anti-Zionism", a viewpoint that deserves more scorn than it receives: When Anti-Zionism Tunnels Under Your House.

    […] Anti-Zionism might have been a respectable point of view before 1948, when the question of Israel’s existence was in the future and up for debate. Today, anti-Zionism is a call for the elimination of a state — details to follow regarding the fate befalling those who currently live in it.

    Note the distinction: Anti-Zionists are not advocating the reform of a state, as Japan was reformed after 1945. Nor are they calling for the adjustment of a state’s borders, as Canada’s border with the United States was periodically adjusted in the 19th century. They’re not talking about the birth of a separate state, either, as South Sudan was born out of Sudan in 2011. And they’re certainly not championing the partition of a multiethnic state into ethnically homogenous components, as Yugoslavia was partitioned after 1991.

    Anti-Zionism is ideologically unique in insisting that one state, and one state only, doesn’t just have to change. It has to go. By a coincidence that its adherents insist is entirely innocent, this happens to be the Jewish state, making anti-Zionists either the most disingenuous of ideologues or the most obtuse.

    Emphasis added.

    That would make a good challenge for the next person you notice claiming they're "just anti-Zionist": Are you in favor of doing away with any other country besides Israel?


  • And our Google LFOD alert rang for a Union Leader article about a Manchester NH group looking for educational improvement: Manchester Proud chooses design partner for new strategic plan for city schools.

    Members of Manchester Proud — a citizens’ coalition committed to uniting the Queen City behind an aspirational vision for its school system — announced Wednesday the group has chosen a firm to help design a new strategic plan for city schools.

    Manchester Proud issued a release Wednesday saying after “a rigorous, six month search process” the organization’s Consultant Selection Work Group chose 2Revolutions, LLC to partner with in crafting “an aspirational and achievable strategic plan” for the Manchester School District.

    To be honest, it sounds like standard educratese. But the founder of "2Revolutions" knows how to suck up to Granite staters:

    “We believe our first-hand knowledge of the context of the state makes us strong partners. We have learned that ‘Live Free or Die’ is a living concept in New Hampshire public education. We respect the importance and power of local communities to steer public education and we’re excited to leverage our unique skill set to support such an important, community-driven transformation effort.”

    At least no taxpayer money seems to be directly involved: "The effort is funded entirely by private citizens, business leaders, and community organizations in Manchester."


  • At a website called 5280, which I assume means Denver, Jay Bouchard writes An Ode to 3.2 Beer, Which Is Leaving Colorado Grocery Stores in 2019. (Yes, the legal pot state finally got around to legalizing the sale of full-strength beer.)

    Jay relates his Colorado beer education when a new roommate scorned his choice of brewski, three point two Coors Lite:

    He then explained that what I purchased was something less than “real” beer. It was 3.2 percent, because in Colorado you could only buy full-strength brews in liquor stores. I was floored by the concept. I grew up in New Hampshire, where the native folk Live Free or Die and buy booze (and maple syrup and bullets) at country stores. I spent my college years in Montana, where it was so easy to buy beer that even the mule deer were tipsy. And New Mexico? In the Land of Enchantment, whiskey shooters were sold at gas stations behind the counter, right next to Marlboro Reds.

    Our liquor sales are still restricted to state-run stores, but at least they're convenient to the Interstates.


Last Modified 2024-01-24 11:52 AM EDT