As I type,
has Beto! with a 1.4% chance of winning the Democratic nomination
for President. This puts him in a solid tenth place, behind Liz,
Wheezy Joe, Kamala, Bernie, Mayor Pete, Yang, Tulsi, Spartacus, and
(whoa!) Hillary Clinton.
(He is, however, ahead of Michelle Obama, Julian Castro, Amy Klobuchar, Andrew Cuomo, Oprah Winfrey, Kirsten Gillibrand, Sherrod Brown, Jay Inslee, and Hickenlooper. There are some actually-running candidates in that list.)
Apparently his campaign advisors have convinced him that fear-based demagogy on guns is a good way to improve his numbers. The HuffPo reports: Beto O’Rourke Calls For Mandatory Assault Weapon Buyback, Returns To Campaign Trail. Subhed: "'If at this moment we do not wake up to this threat, then we as a country will die in our sleep,' he said."
Die. In our sleep.
At the NR Corner, Charles C. W. Cooke disapproves of the euphemism: ‘Mandatory Buy-Back’ Means ‘Confiscation’.
One more time, with feeling: “Mandatory buy-back” is a cowardly and cynical euphemism, and members of the press should not be using it outside of quotation marks. What O’Rourke is proposing here is gun confiscation, coupled with limited compensation. Every time somebody in the media uses the term “buy-back,” they are laundering O’Rourke’s extremism.
Even on its own, “buy-back” makes no sense as a term: Were O’Rourke to get his way, the government would not be “buying back” the guns on his list because the government did not own, or sell, any of the guns on his list in the first instance. When coupled with the word “mandatory,” the pretense becomes farcical.
CCWC goes on to observe that you expect politicians to use weaselly language, but journalists shouldn't.
At Reason, Jacob Sullum notes that it's apparently now
the Current Wisdom that
the Supreme Court should be
SCOTUS Should Drop This Second Amendment Case, a New York Times Columnist Argues, Because Mass Shootings.
During the term that begins this fall, the Supreme Court is expected to consider its first potentially important Second Amendment case since 2010. The case involves New York City's tight restrictions on transportation of legally owned guns, which the city modified in the hope of rendering the case moot after the Court agreed to hear a challenge to them. New York Times columnist Linda Greenhouse, who was the paper's Supreme Court reporter for three decades, is hoping the justices will decide not to hear the case after all. Her argument is not legal but political, which is puzzling in light of the Supreme Court's responsibility to enforce constitutional guarantees.
I think Jacob is being slightly disingenuous about this being "puzzling". Clearly, Greenhouse does not think it's the Court's responsibility to enforce constitutional guarantees, instead it's there to enforce current leftist political dogma when possible, otherwise to do nothing.
Mark J. Perry
has composed a wicked Venn Diagram:
Venn diagram of the day on the gobbledygook that is Tariff Man’s trade ‘policy’ and the gullibility of his supporters https://t.co/0mR5BItVwE— Mark J. Perry (@Mark_J_Perry) August 15, 2019
Or as Mr. Ramirez would put it:
Orange Man Bad! Alternatives probably worse! We are screwed!
At American Consequences, P. J. O'Rourke, apparently no
close relation to Beto!, provides something we all need:
A Brief History of How Communication Devolved.
The computer is a handy device. It’s terrific for looking up who played Wally Cleaver on Leave It to Beaver. But the computer is essentially meaningless to wisdom, learning, and sense.
My laptop may be a great technological improvement on my old IBM Selectric. (Wally was played Tony Dow – I just Googled it.) But there is no historical indication that technological improvements in the way we inscribe our ideas lead to improvement in the wisdom, learning, and sense of the ideas themselves.
The opposite case can be made. When words had to be carved in stone, we got the Ten Commandments.
When we needed to make our own ink and chase a goose around the yard to obtain a quill, we got William Shakespeare.
When the fountain pen was invented, we got Henry James.
When the typewriter came along, we got Jack Kerouac.
And with the advent of the smartphone keypad we get… Donald Trump on Twitter.
Yeah, I see what you mean. Click through for the first word to ever appear on the Internet, which I did not know.