Daniel J. Mitchell says:
Some Folks on the Left Are Honest…but Very Wrong.
As part of my collection of honest leftists, I have a bunch of columns highlighting how some advocates of big government (including, to their credit, Bernie Sanders and Andrew Yang) don’t hide from reality.
I’m unalterably opposed to their policies, but at least they openly admit that huge tax increases on ordinary people are needed in order to finance a European-style welfare state.
Daniel adds the authors of this WaPo column to the august list.
They enthusiastically endorse the model seen in other countries (stop me if you've heard this):
- The government takes a lot more of your money.
- They give some of it back to you in "free" stuff.
- They make you believe they've done you a favor.
At a site named Credit Takeoff, Mike Pearson has a cool
30 Years Of America's Wealthiest People.
Let's see if I can't embed it:
Keep an eye out for Jeff Bezos.
The lost verse of John Lennon's "Imagine", as writen by libertarian
What If There Was No Legal Smoking Age?.
Just like any age, 21 is arbitrary. At some point, without an all-out war on tobacco, we must allow people to make potentially life-threatening choices. And that’s where Smith’s framework most importantly informs this debate. Individuals and their friends and families, older siblings and mentors all have just a little bit of knowledge about what makes sense for any given person.
The process of discovering each individual’s best balance between instant gratification and health risks down the road is messy. [Adam] Smith’s critics, as they do in his economics treatise, falsely assume he ascribes super human rationality to his subjects. That only came later when future generations tried to fully mathematize the work of the classical economists.
There is no magic bullet. Whether government-mandated or left in the hands of individuals, tobacco use will lead some to tragic consequences. Kids will get cigarettes either way, and adults will try and fail to stop. In this scenario of no good choices, the course that encourages responsibility and humanity seems like something we might want to try.
The result of treating adults as irresponsible children… is a country where adults act like irresponsible children.
And in other sad news, the Daily Wire reports:
Sir Patrick Stewart Says New 'Star Trek' Series Will Take On Trump, Brexit.
The new “Star Trek” series starring Sir Patrick Stewart isn’t being explicitly billed as “woke,” but it seems the series’ star, who will reprise his role as the legendary Enterprise captain, Jean-Luc Picard, believes “Star Trek: Picard” will have a message for anti-immigrant leaders and global isolationists.
I guess this is good news: no temptation whatsoever to watch this tedious exercise.
And the Supreme Court passed up a chance …
Female nipples a no-show in Live Free or Die New Hampshire.
The Supreme Court said Monday that it will not take up a challenge to a New Hampshire city ordinance banning women from appearing topless in public.
So much for the New Hampshire "Live Free or Die" battle cry. Lawmakers want female breasts kept tied up, locked away and covered up.
The refusal to hear the case left in place a 2019 ruling by New Hampshire's top court which supported convictions levied on Heidi Lilley, Kia Sinclair and Ginger Pierro for violation of nudity laws after all three women bared their breasts four years ago.
We will just have to be satisfied with taping over the state motto on our license plates, as long as we meet the state's dress code while doing so.