-
I suspect this happens more often than we generally realize:
- A scientific paper is published that presents equivocal data of marginal statistical significance;
- The results are overinterpreted by the
author of a science-popularizing
book who casts it into support of his provocative thesis; he cites the paper
in a supporting footnote that nobody follows up on, but
looks solid;
- The book is endlessly quoted by magazines and newspaper op-eds, and the dubious thesis becomes Scientific Truth for the masses.
Mark Liberman at Language Log does some impressive detective work in tracking down a (probably) mistaken overgeneralization in the area of cognitive differences between boys and girls, and shows pretty convincingly that it's a specific case of the process above. Any others?
-
Not that this, or most any, blog is a paragon of spelling virtue, but
…
headline on a blog
post at a site entitled "ProgressiveU":
If your going to college...READ THIS!!!
Moan. -
William F. Buckley Jr.
on George W. Bush, Jacob Weisberg, and articulateness.
-
And say what you will about Al "No
Controlling Legal Authority"
Gore, but he can occasionally be tempted to at least pretend
that he has a sense of self-deprecating humor.
"It's funny because it's true."
Jun
25
2006
URLs du Jour
2006-06-25