At NR, Kevin D. Williamson describes
50-Way Abortion Fight. ("NRPlus Member Article")
The state legislatures are full of activity related to abortion. This is as it should be.
New York passed a law making it easier to perform grisly late-term abortions and then celebrated by lighting up the Empire State Building in pink, as though a baby girl had been born rather than sentenced to death by surgical dismemberment. Other states are considering similar laws, while in Georgia abortion has been prohibited once a heartbeat is detectable, and in Alabama the procedure has been almost categorically outlawed.
This is what the post-Roe world is going to look like: divisive, ugly, and possibly irreconcilable — democratic, in a word.
That's the best case scenario, at least for now. My own state is one of those who say that baby-killing is fine up until birth, but then immediately becomes a heinous crime. People claim this with a straight face.
Roger L. Simon answers your burning questions about the College
Board's 'Adversity Score' scheme:
The College Board Just Shot Itself in the Foot with Its New 'Adversity Score' Scheme.
In the midst of multiple college admissions and general higher education scandals -- celebrity-paid test taking, discrimination lawsuit against Harvard, overwhelming academic bias, administrations growing faster than faculties, etc. -- The College Board decided to institute an "adversity score" for applicants. This score would use 15 variables to quantify the student's socioeconomic challenges -- poor neighborhoods, bad schools, etc. It's masked affirmative action.
This would all be done in secret, the applicants and their families unable to question or even see the results. Only the colleges could see it.
In a probably-related development, the University Near Here announced that it was dumping the SAT/ACT requirement for applicants. (Also probably related to that: the so-far unannounced drop in admitted UNH students for Fall 2019. "Hm. We need to make it easier for kids to get in.")
There's new P. J. O'Rourke content at American Consequences.
In which he announces:
It’s The End of the World.
Classical Liberalism has had a good run. Now it’s about to get run over… by a bus full of stupid “post-capitalist” political trends – the new socialism, the new nationalism, the new trade-war mercantilism, and the new social media platforms that drive this bus. Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, Donald Trump, and the countless candidates running for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination are all on board. So are the Brexiteers and so, for that matter, are the maniacally micro-regulating bureaucrats of the EU that the Brexiteers want to leave.
Wave goodbye to Classical Liberalism.
Or you could just wave at the camera you’re facing on your phone or computer. Too late to put a sticky note over it. Your civil liberties are already gone, swiped left. Neither a click falls on a keypad nor a finger taps a touch screen without the Internet seeing.
Peej is a tad pessimistic this month. Still… I wouldn't bet heavily on him being wrong.
Oh, wait. (Eyes retirement savings.) I am betting heavily on him being wrong.
You Think Capitalism Is Dying Because Two Companies ‘Control 90
Percent of the Beer Americans Drink,’ Go Home, You’re Drunk.
That particular factoid is from Jonathan Tepper, author of The
Myth of Capitalism (available at right if you care).
Among the evidence he marshals is the fact that "two corporations control 90 percent of the beer Americans drink." Tepper's numbers seem a bit high. According to the latest edition of Beer Marketer's Insights, a trade publication, Anheuser-Busch Inbev controls 41 percent of the market, MillerCoors owns another 24 percent, and "since 2017, more than 9 percent of the market volume has shifted from large brewers and importers to smaller brewers and importers."
But let's grant Tepper his large point: Two mega-players dominate the market for beer. How has that been working out for beer drinkers? Pretty damn well, actually. Go back to, say, 1990, when the microbrewery revolution was barely a thing and I started graduate school at SUNY-Buffalo. My friends and I would drive across the Peace Bridge to Canada specifically to drink Molson and Labatt's because it was so much better than American beer. Such a thought is inconceivable now given the proliferation of choices available to today's beer drinkers. Some of that choice comes from Anheuser-Busch, MillerCoors, and other big brewers, and much of it comes from small, scrappy startups.
Could be that Tepper spends too much time writing and not enough time wandering down the beer aisle at Walmart.
At Reason, Nick Gillespie provides a sobriety check: