… sells road maps for the soul to the old folks home and the college:
When I wrote about Vice President Biden's visit to
the University Near Here yesterday, I didn't talk too much about
the actual substance behind the visit: issuance of new regulations from the
Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR)
dealing not only
with sexual violence, but also sexual "discrimination" and "harassment".
All of that's problematic for anyone who prefers limited government. But the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) issued a statement on the latter bits. Realizing that universities have a long history of using "harassment" as an excuse to shut down constitutionally-protected expression, FIRE notes:
In discussing the legal obligations borne by colleges and universities under Title IX to respond to both sexual harassment and sexual violence committed against students, OCR fails to sufficiently recognize the fact that public universities may not violate the First Amendment rights of their students and that private universities must honor their promises of freedom of expression to their students. Nowhere in Assistant Secretary Russlyn Ali's letter are free expression concerns mentioned, nor is OCR's 2003 "Dear Colleague" letter regarding the intersection of freedom of expression and harassment policies referenced or cited for further guidance. In that 2003 letter, former Assistant Secretary Gerald A. Reynolds made clear that "OCR's regulations and policies do not require or prescribe speech, conduct or harassment codes that impair the exercise of rights protected under the First Amendment."It's a safe bet that we'll see an increase in unconstitutional foolishness from our institutions of higher ed in the near future as a result of this effort by Our Federal Government. Most of which, and hopefully all of which, will be eventually swatted down under long-standing precedent in the court system.
Which would be amusing, except for the utter waste in time and resources and the disciplinary havoc wreaked on students.
Pun Salad has occasionally aimed its ire at Official New York Times
Food Nag Mark Bittman over the past
not that I'm obsessed or anything. Once a lazy blogger finds an easy
Anyway, Rick Berman gets in on the fun at the Daily Caller. Sample:
This much is inescapable if you spend any time reading Mark Bittman's meanderings: If you want to recover from your acute case of not being Mark Bittman, you need to spend hours upon hours cooking at home every day. And what you cook has to satisfy his finely tuned sense of high-minded food snobbery.I hope we'll be able to peek at Bittman now and again through the NYT paywall. (So far, it hasn't hindered my browsing. You?)
days back I moaned and groaned about the "fact", as reported
in the New York Times that the General Electric Corporation
was paying no 2010 taxes. My bad: I believed the New York Times.
And they want me to buy a digital subscription… why, again?
Balko does the universe a service by juxtaposing
quotes from celebrity airheads: ex-Mouseketeer
Britney Spears and Mother Jones
lefty blogger Kevin Drum. Balko's site appears broken as I type, so,
pulled from the Google cache:
"Honestly, I think we should just trust our president in every decision he makes and should just support that, you know, and be faithful in what happens."
-Britney Spears, in 2003, commenting on the war in Iraq.
"But the reason I voted for Obama in 2008 is because I trust his judgment. And not in any merely abstract way, either: I mean that if he and I were in a room and disagreed about some issue on which I had any doubt at all, I'd literally trust his judgment over my own. I think he's smarter than me, better informed, better able to understand the consequences of his actions, and more farsighted. I voted for him because I trust him, and I still do."
- Mother Jones blogger Kevin Drum, in 2011, on Obama's war in Libya.
If anyone tries to tell you that Adam Smith advocated progressive
taxation, you'll wish you had bookmarked this David